data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e643e/e643e2ad37117faf4242c3ac27f00e5079861584" alt="Lisa receives Master of Art degree at Erasmus University Rotterdam"
My take: In the past culture was something for the rich and upper echelons of society - those who could afford it. After 1960s this all changed. In the Netherlands the government started to subsidize culture, especially the type of 'highbrow' or 'fringe' culture which was not commercially viable on its own. It seems with the current economic crisis this policy is under scrutiny again and about to change. In all fairness the world has changed. In the Netherlands even most adolescents are now 'rich' enough to be able to afford the monthly smart phone bills. Mostly because they now all have (part time) jobs - this was not the norm when I was young. So, I think there is a market. The fact that Pop festivals have sprung up like wildfire the last couple of years is proof of this since they are - by and large - not subsidized. But the transition from guaranteed income from government to commercially viable enterprises will no doubt be painful. The commercial viability of popular music venues in Amsterdam is beyond doubt; they are and will continue to thrive. But the economic viability of venues in the provincial towns in the Netherlands is in question. Just image asking Madonna to perform at a gig in Groningen. "Where the **** is Groningen?" These harsh economic facts-of-life were dampened by government intervention for a long time. But, The times they are a-changin' (again)