Sunday, June 10. 2012
Orfeo ed Euridice at Soestdijk
The stage is the palace pond. Yes, that is right, the opera singers and actors were definitely getting their feet wet! I had never seen anything like this before and it is quite clever. A lot of the stage props were hidden under water and suddenly appeared when needed. Very innovative. The performance started at 21:30 and lasted until 23:30. The darkness was also used very effectively and allowed custom stage lighting of the palace building in the background and the trees around the park. They even hired a falconry firm to have birds flying around. Believe me, nothing was left to chance here!
Orfeo ed Euridice at Soestdijk. Photo by Leo van Velzen.
The story follows the well known Greek myth. Orfeo and Euridice are happily married until a fatal snake bite kills Euridice. The opera starts with Orfeo’s laments. Amor takes note of Orfeo’s beautiful singing and takes pity on Orfeo. Amor proposes a deal. Orfeo is allowed to cross over into the Underworld, find Euridice and take her with him back to earth. There is one condition: he is not to look at her until they reach earth again. So after defying furies who at first do not want to let him in, Orfeo finds his way to the Underworld and locates his wife Euridice. He refuses to look at her and she becomes quite distraught, thinking Orfeo does not love her anymore. At this point they sing a famous duet: "Vieni, appaga il tuo consorte" (“Come, satisfy your husband”). Orefo manages to withstand her for only so long and after a while looks her in the eye. Euridice dies again. Orfeo sings of his grief in the famous aria "Che farò senza Euridice?" ("What shall I do without Euridice?"/"I have lost my Euridice"). Orfeo decides he will kill himself to join Euridice in the Underworld, but Amor returns (on a bike!) to stop him. In reward for Orfeo's continued love, Amor returns Euridice to life, and she and Orfeo are reunited. After a four-movement ballet, all sing in praise of Amor ("Trionfi Amore").
Janne’s comment afterwards: why didn’t he just say: “Yo, chick, just follow me outta here, can’t say why, but I love ya! ”
Tuesday, May 8. 2012
The Moors in Andalusia
This is the roof of the Mezquita Mosque in Cordoba.
I was not disappointed; they were both stunning. Right there at the top of the list of most beautiful and impressive cultural sites I have ever seen. On reflection. I find the Mezquita most impressive, its construction being started in 781 AD and the Alhambra the more beautiful and younger (1100 AD) of the two.
I have read a lot about the Islamic rule in Spain which lasted from 711 AD till 1492 AD, the very same year Columbus set sail from Andalusia to discover what was later called America. For 781 years the Moors ruled over varying parts of the Iberian peninsula. Indeed, were it not for a legendary battle in the middle of modern France, the Battle of Tours/Poirtiers in 732 AD in which Charles Martel (grandfather of Charlemagne) defeated the Moors, modern Europe could have easily been Islamic instead of Christian.
How come, the Moors were able to conquer the Christian kingdoms so quickly? Well, part of the story is that they had the stirrup. This made possible the concept of heavy cavalry. A fully armoured ‘knight’ could wield a heavy sword or lance while bracing himself using the stirrup. European countries had no such heavy cavalry. It was the sheer military genius of Charles Martel which allowed an army of foot soldiers to beat the heavy cavalry of the Moors (plus a little luck and the element of surprise). They were no ordinary foot soldiers by the way, it was the first full time year-round professional army in Europe and they were very good at the tactic of "Holding the Line". It won them the battle. It is said that Charles himself studied the stirrups after the battle and quickly adopted them for use in his own army. Next time, I am in Paris, France, I will want to visit the tomb of Charles Martel in the Saint Denis Basilica and contemplate the words of the historian Edward Gibbon: “Christendom ... delivered ... by the genius and good fortune of one man, Charles Martel.”
Was Islamic rule in Spain a bad thing in it self? It seems this is a matter of perspective. Obviously this issue is likely to hit a nerve because of the current animosity between Christianity and Islam.
For one thing it is not simply a matter of the Moors conquering Christian lands and oppressing the righteous and faithful. The Moors were invited by some wealthy Christian Visigoth overlords to help settle a land dispute; all 7,000 of them. Some of the locals saw them as liberators and converted to Islam willingly. In the course of over 700 years a lot of native Spaniards converted willingly to Islam. This is a little fact often overlooked in history. This made the Reconquista more of an ugly civil war than anything else. In modern terms, think of Northern Ireland and you will get the picture.
The Moors in Andalusia spent more of their wealth on culture and architecture than defense. When they were cornered by the Christian armies they called for help from their Moroccan Berber friends: The Almohads. Now these were a different people. In today's terms we would call them Islamic Fundamentalists. The Almohads were appalled by what they saw in Spain. The Moors of Andalusia had clearly strayed off the path in their view by absorbing Christian values into their Moorish culture. A disgrace! A lot of the destruction of Cultural artifacts in Andalusia was done on orders of the Almohads. The more popular view of barbarous Moors occupying Spain thus really better suits the Almohads than the Moors as such. Al the more an excuse for the Christians to kick the Moors out. And that they did. The job was finally and conclusively done in 1492. For a hundred years or so after that, laws were passed to protect the Muslim and Jewish population. Until in the 16th century the Spanish Crown, busy fighting wars all over the known world, decided it could no longer afford a large minority Muslim population right in their own heartland. In an unprecedented act of ethnic cleansing all the native Spaniards adhering to the Muslim faith were forcibly removed from Spain. That or killed.
Depending on were you look you will find very different versions of this tragic story.
The British Channel 4 documentary “When the Moors Ruled in Europe,” by Bettany Hughes basically argues the point that Christian Europe was inferior in all the aspects in which the Moors were excelling. The Moors had a high regard for learning, even the common people were encouraged to become literate and study. The Moors had irrigation, sewer systems, water closets and a successful agriculture. Their cities were pleasingly laid out, with harmoniously proportioned buildings and exotic and fragrant fruit trees to delight the senses. They even brought hairspray and deodorant to Spain.
The Partal(garden) at the Alhambra in Grenada.
Bettany Hughes shows us their leadership in translating and keeping alive the Greek and Roman classics, science, medicine, marine navigation, and astronomy, and reminds us that many words in our vocabulary approach from the Arabic. She touches upon the fact that they welcomed Jews, and their knowledge. Most indispensable of all, she reminds us that we currently use Arabic numerals, and that the substantial leaps forward in bookkeeping that underlay the businesses that bankrolled the famous Renaissance of the 16th century, could never have occurred if clerks were still struggling with those clumsy Roman numerals. Nor, of course, could Europe have rediscovered the Roman and Greek classics, another major ingredient of the Renaissance, had the Moors not preserved them.
The extreme other point of view can be read at a conservative blog in the USA commenting on a conference held at the Virginia Military Institute in 2011 called “East meets West.” and commemorating the Moorish invasion of Spain. www.theblogmocracy.com/2011/02/06/bigotry-on-display-at-vmi/
Reza Aslan is scheduled to speak on a panel entitled “‘Al-Andalus’ – an ageless Model of Tolerance“, but it is doubtful that Aslan and his co-panelists will be discussing the widespread persecution of Christians and Jews under Muslim rule that led to the establishment of an entirely new class of Roman Catholic martyrs, “the Cordoba martyrs“, or the 1066 massacre of Jews and crucifixion their leader Joseph ha-Nagid in “tolerant” Cordoba. The great Jewish scholar Maimonides and his family fled “tolerant” Cordoba after the Muslim conquest of the city in 1148, when the new occupiers gave Jews the option of converting to Islam, death or exile. A similar persecution emulating the Almohad’s “model of tolerance” prompted Maimonides to write his famous Epistle on Forced Conversion to the Jewish community in Yemen. Restoring ‘“Al-Andalus’ – an ageless Model of Tolerance” has been the stated goal of Al-Qaeda. In September 2007 Ayman al-Zawahiri issued an audio tape calling for the reconquest of “Al-Andalus” and more recently called for the “cleansing” of North Africa of Spaniards and the French as preparation for the reoccupation of “Al-Andalus”. An al-Qaeda-linked cyber-jihadist group that targets US companies with hacks and computer worms styles themselves as “The Brigades of Tariq ibn Ziyad”, named after the invader and occupier of Spain…
So what to think of all this?
For more than 700 years the Moors had a civilization going in Spain which was without a doubt more advanced than anything else seen in Europe at the time. More advanced in terms of its science, agriculture, economics and law. Was it also tolerant and benign? Again compared to the norm at that time in Europe, probably yes. Compared to today’s norms, certainly not. Were there pogroms and massacres committed by the Moors (more likely the Almohads) against the Jews? Yes, but they are of rare occurrence in Islamic history. The latter cannot be said of the treatment of Jews and Muslims by Christians in Europe.
My photos of 2012 trip to Andalucia
Wednesday, April 25. 2012
There ain't no such thing as a free lunch
In order to comply with the Maastricht treaty rule of limiting the budget deficit to 3% of GDP the Dutch government had to find 14 billion in cuts for the 2013 budget. This was totally unexpected and rather embarrassing in light of the continued lecturing by the same Dutch government of their Southern European colleagues on the very same subject earlier this year.
Mr. Geert Wilder's argument for withdrawing his parliamentary support for the minority government was that he cannot in good conscience agree to cuts that will result in an ordinary elderly Dutch person - the famous and fictitious Mr. Henk senior - having 500 euros less to spend in 2013.
Have you ever owed a debt? Then you will know that, as long as you owe a bank a single euro/dollar/yen/whatever, they own you. If you cannot pay the interest due, they inevitable show a legal contract, signed by you, entitling them to do a bunch of very unpleasant things backed by the full force of law.
The funny thing is that in the context of governments borrowing money it was somehow always presented the other way around. Investors, if they were really very well behaved and played nice, were granted the privilege to lend their money to the Dutch government. Why was this? I suppose the biggest reason was that lending money to Western governments in general and to the Dutch government in particular was perceived as being a very, very safe investment. I understand earlier this year the Dutch government secured a short term loan with a negative interest rate. this means investors, in this case banks, were paying money to have their money deposited in the coffers of the Dutch State. Now why would they do that? The answer is that in a very unsafe world, investors are all struggling to keep their money somewhere safe. Especially if you are a bank and do not trust other banks with your money.
It is this perception that governments are a very safe place to deposit your money that is in question in this crisis. This perception is formalized in the credit rating of a country. Presently the Netherlands is one of the few countries left in Europe with a triple-A status, the highest mark a country can get for being a safe place for your money.
The auction room at the Ministry of Finance where loans are being secured by the Dutch government. See the NOS TV item on the dsta (in Dutch).
Because of this perceived safe haven status the Dutch government can borrow money at a rate of 2.3%. Germany is currently perceived to be the safest place for your money, so it can borrow at a rate of 1.72%. Spain is thought to be less safe, and must pay 5.67%, not to mention Greece, which at some point last year faced a mind boggling 20% interest rate. Just for reference the USA can borrow presently at a rate of 1.99%, in dollars that is. Although a bunch of financial indicators are less favorable compared to The Netherlands and Germany. The reasons for this are complex and could be the subject of another blog entry but in essence it comes down to a simple fact: the USA are presently top dog in the world.
So to put all this in perspective some comparisons
The total Dutch outstanding debt is estimated at 407 billion euros. At a rate of 2.3% this means the Dutch government must pay some 9.4 billion euros interest each year. Were the Dutch government be perceived as safe as Germany this sum would be only 7 billion. On the other hand if the Dutch were in the same position as the Spanish, they would have to pay a whopping 23 billion euros interest a year. The really, really bad thing about all this is that perceptions can change very quickly. And everything depends on perception here.
Some more perspective
The entire Dutch defense budget is about 8 billion euros a year. Fact 1: getting rid of defense completely will not even help the Dutch in 2013 to stay within the 3% deficit norm, since 14 billion is needed for that. Fact 2: If the Dutch were deemed as safe as Germany, roughly a quarter of the entire Dutch defense budget could be paid for by the savings in interest payments alone. Fact 3: If the Dutch government were to have no debt whatsoever, they could fund the entire current Defense budget with the savings on interest payments. Easy, and have some spare change at that. Why do I bring up Defense in this context you ask? Well it is an historic fact that any country not attending to its defenses in the long run will get invaded/conquered/destroyed by someone who just simply can get away with it. If you do not like my Defense example, please realize the Dutch government's total spending on foreign aid amounts to 3.4 billion a year and do the math yourself.
Even more perspective
The Netherlands has roughly 16 million inhabitants. So the total debt per Dutchman is about: 25.000 euros. Yes, each and every Dutchman, woman and child owes roughly 25.000 euros and pays 588 euros interest per year. At German interest rates, every Dutchman would pay only 438 euro interest per year and at Spanish rates that would be 1438 euros per year.
The uptake of all this?
"There ain't no such thing as a free lunch" is an old American lesson which is finally being taught to governments in Europe. I suppose my biggest revelation while researching this issue is the realization that the relative standing of the Dutch government in the pecking order of financial trust is a big deal. Having to pay 9.4 billion a year (Netherlands now) versus 23 billion a year (Dutch debt at Spain's rates) dwarfs all political discussion and bickering about budget cuts. It also puts into perspective the real spending choices political parties have while owing so much money to others. Oh, and by the way you did get the fact that the Netherlands spends more money on paying interest on its debt than on defense, did you? Good, I thought you did.
PS in reality outstanding debt of the Netherlands is on average financed with seven year loans. This is done to insulate against short term interest fluctuations. So calculating the interest due on all outstanding debt based on the daily interest rate is a deliberate simplification on my part. It is really complicated stuff folks.
Now why would any government go to the trouble of borrowing money at such cost if they have the legal right to simply print the stuff? This will the the subject of a later blog entry, so stay tuned!
Saturday, April 21. 2012
Ultimate Watch Quest over?
After that I received another birthday gift in 1998. A Seiko Kinetic Titanium watch. Cool! No more batteries and very allergy and perspiration resistant. I lost the time syncing capability, that was too bad. Another - related - downside of this watch is that it does not have a perpetual calender. Every 30 day month I have to advance the calender one day manually. Not to mention leap years...
So already in 1998 I envisioned the 'Ultimate Watch': It syncs itself to an atomic reference clock anywhere on earth (the fact that it does not work in outer space is acceptable for the time being), it does not need a battery (by using solar or kinetic energy) and the strap is made of Titanium (no perspiration woes for me).
Too bad nobody could make a watch like this forever. Until I saw this March 2012 announcement:
Meet the Seiko Astron GPS solar. Available in selected stores around the World from August 2012.
This wrist watch totally meets all of my requirements except for one. With a recommended consumer price of over 3000 euros it is prohibitively expensive. Oh well, I better start saving...
Once I really do own this watch I foresee another problem. I will need to go to Kathmandu, Nepal and find out if my watch really automatically syncs to official Nepal time, UTC+05:45. Yes that is 5 hours and 45 minutes ahead of Greenwich Mean Time.
On a side note
In the Junghans entry on Wikipedia it is mentioned that Junghans and Seiko are working together on a truly 'global' watch that knows about all the 39 official time zones on Earth. Aha...
Friday, April 13. 2012
My first web blog, version 0.9
Today I installed and configured my first web blogging system. I used the Simple PHP Blog software, version 0.8. After that I wrote the first couple of articles.
Things I like about Simple PHP Blog:
- it is really simple; works out of "the box"
- no database necessary
Things I do not like about Simple PHP Blog:
- after entering an article the screen goes blank (this is fixed in version 0.8.1)
- after entering a comment the screen goes blank - maybe it is too simple ...
So am I being serious with this? Am I going to keep blogging? I do not know. For now, I am just testing ...
Thursday, April 12. 2012
The Fourth Crusade
The painting on the right is called "Entry of the Crusaders into Constantinople" by Eugène Delacroix, 1840.
This is one of those pivotal moments in history. Its importance cannot be easily overestimated, even from a distance of 808 years. What happened?
The aim of the Fourth Crusade was to recapture Jerusalem for Christianity. Boniface of Montferrat the leader of the Crusade, with full papal approval and support, negotiated a shipping contract with the Venetians to transport 33500 crusaders to Egypt for an agreed sum of 85000 silver marks. The Venetians took a full year to build 50 war galleys and 450 transports. Too bad only 12000 crusaders showed up in Venice with 51000 silver marks. The Doge of Venice was not amused. He demanded that the Crusaders invade the rival port of Zara in Croatia as a form of financial compensation. Some of the crusaders refused and returned home. The majority of the army followed their leaders to Zara in an attempt to prevent the crusade's complete failure. A letter from the Pope to the leadership threatening excommunication if the army attacked Christian neighbors was concealed from the army. The Christian city of Zara was sacked by the Christian army of the Fourth Crusade on November 23, 1202. When Pope Innocent III heard of the sack of Zara he sent a letter to the crusaders excommunicating them. Out of fear that this would dissolve the army the leaders of the crusade decided not to inform the army of this. Anyway, a little later, regarding the Crusaders as having been blackmailed by the Venetians, The Pope rescinded the excommunications against all non-Venetians in the expedition. Boniface of Montferrat, meanwhile, met with the Byzantine prince Alexios Angelos, the son of the recently deposed Byzantine emperor Isaac II Angelos. Alexios offered to pay the entire debt owed to the Venetians, give 200000 silver marks to the Crusaders, 10000 Byzantine professional troops for the Crusade, the maintenance of 500 knights in the Holy Land, the service of the Byzantine navy to transport the Crusader army to Egypt and the placement of the Eastern Orthodox Church under the authority of the Pope if they would sail to Constantinople (Byzantium) and topple the reigning emperor Alexios III Angelos. It was a tempting offer for an enterprise that was short on funds. Boniface agreed. Most of the rest of the Crusade's leaders eventually accepted the plan as well. Again not all agreed. Those who refused to take part in the scheme to attack Christendom's greatest city left the Crusade and sailed on their own to Syria.
Thus it happened that the great Christian army of the Fourth Crusade lay siege to one of the oldest and most prosperous Christian cities on earth. Starting July 11th 2013 it took the army until April 12th 2014 to the breach the defenses of Constantinople. Too bad the promised riches failed to materialize. Although Alexios tried in desperation to melt down priceless Byzantine icons, he could not keep his part of the bargain. What followed was a sack described by Speros Vryonis in his book 'Byzantium and Europe' as follows: "The Latin soldiery subjected the greatest city in Europe to an indescribable sack. For three days they murdered, raped, looted and destroyed on a scale which even the ancient Vandals and Goths would have found unbelievable. Constantinople had become a veritable museum of ancient and Byzantine art, an emporium of such incredible wealth that the Latins were astounded at the riches they found. Though the Venetians had an appreciation for the art which they discovered (they were themselves semi-Byzantines) and saved much of it, the French and others destroyed indiscriminately, halting to refresh themselves with wine, violation of nuns, and murder of Orthodox clerics. The Crusaders vented their hatred for the Greeks most spectacularly in the desecration of the greatest Church in Christendom. They smashed the silver iconostasis, the icons and the holy books of Hagia Sophia, and seated upon the patriarchal throne a whore who sang coarse songs as they drank wine from the Church's holy vessels. The estrangement of East and West, which had proceeded over the centuries, culminated in the horrible massacre that accompanied the conquest of Constantinople. The Greeks were convinced that even the Turks, had they taken the city, would not have been as cruel as the Latin Christians. The defeat of Constantinople, already in a state of decline, accelerated political degeneration so that the Byzantines eventually became an easy prey to the Turks. The Crusading movement thus resulted, ultimately, in the victory of Islam, a result which was of course the exact opposite of its original intention."
How come two great Christian civilizations turned against each other eventually leading to the rise of Islam in South Eastern Europe? The experiences of the earlier Crusades had thrown into stark relief the vast cultural differences between the two civilizations. The Latins (as the Byzantines called them because of their adherence to the Latin Rite) viewed the Byzantine preference for diplomacy and trade over war, as duplicitous and degenerate, and their policy of tolerance and assimilation towards Muslims as a corrupt betrayal of the faith. For their part, the educated and wealthy Byzantines saw the Latins as lawless, impious, covetous, blood-thirsty, undisciplined and unwashed (literally). However, although maybe a little smelly, in one of the first cavalry skirmishes during the siege of Constantinople just 80 Frankish knights defeated 500 Byzantine horsemen.
Eight hundred years after the Fourth Crusade, Pope John Paul II twice expressed sorrow for the events of the Fourth Crusade. In 2001, he wrote to Christodoulos, Archbishop of Athens, saying, "It is tragic that the assailants, who set out to secure free access for Christians to the Holy Land, turned against their brothers in the faith. The fact that they were Latin Christians fills Catholics with deep regret." In 2004, while Bartholomew I, Patriarch of Constantinople, was visiting the Vatican, John Paul II asked, "How can we not share, at a distance of eight centuries, the pain and disgust." This has been regarded as an apology to the Greek Orthodox Church for the terrible slaughter perpetrated by the warriors of the Fourth Crusade.
Much of the material in this article comes from the Wikipedia entry on the Fourth Crusade. I encourage everyone to read and heed this. Follow this link.
Friday, April 6. 2012
Cobra Museum visit
This is a painting by Jan Nieuwenhuys called Sleepwalking Cock, 1948.
As usual, I made photographs of all works of art that interested us.
Sunday, March 25. 2012
Backup DHCP and DNS services in a home network
Summary
Goal: Create both primary and (backup) secondary DHCP and DNS services in a small home network.
Needed: one Linux server, one Windows machine and one DHCP capable router with a telnet interface.
Assumption: some programming experience.
Contra indication: not necessary when two Linux servers are available.
Alternative option: Dual DHCP DNS server, sourceforge.net/projects/dhcp-dns-server/files/.
Note: IP addresses, domain names, user names and passwords used here, do not reflect the actual setup.
Overview
My home network consists of one server running Linux, a number of wired clients running on Microsoft or Apple operating systems and an seemingly ever growing number of wireless clients running on a variety of platforms. The network infrastructure consists of a managed switch, a dual WAN router with wireless AP, a separate second wireless AP, a cable modem and a ADSL modem. The server is running both ISC DHCPD and ISC Bind providing crucial DHCP and DNS service to clients in the network.
The goal is to design the network in such a way that when the server is down (for whatever reason) Internet service to known clients is not interrupted. Specifically, known clients are still able to receive DHCP leases and resolve private domain names to IP addresses and vice versa. Obviously other services the server may provide, e.g. smb shares, are interrupted.
To achieve the stated goal it is necessary to have secondary DHCP and DNS services in case the primary services on the Linux server fail. Figure 1 outlines the design.
Figure 1 DHCP and DNS services and their backups
Read whole article for the details of the setup.
Saturday, March 24. 2012
Pure Passion in the Willibrod Church Utrecht
The St. Willibrord Church in Utrecht is one of the best preserved examples of the Utrecht School of the Gothic Revival. The church is almost invisible in the surrounding buildings, but who enters is immediately struck by the overwhelming impression of this mystical ornate church, built by architect Tepe and the St. Bernulphusgilde.
During the concert I shot a series of publicity photographs. This was quite challenging due to the low light conditions in the church.
Sunday, March 18. 2012
The Fall
So who made this film?
The answer is Tarsem Singh Dhandwar. This is a guy who made his fortune filming some of the best TV commercials. You will know them when you see them: Nike, Pepsi Cola, BMW and the likes. Apparently he went all over the world to film these commercials and the very special places he visited stuck in his mind. A dozen or so years later he made the Fall. Since nobody wanted to sponsor a commercials director wanting to make this movie, he funded the whole enterprise out of his own pocket. Some of the other movies Tarsem made are: The Cell (2000), Immortals (2011) and Mirror Mirror (2012). I am sure The Fall will achieve cult status. Yes, it is that good in my opinion. A very motivated fan created a website with (nearly) all the Fall locations.
Awesome!
Tuesday, March 6. 2012
Lightroom 4 is out
Years of painstakingly adding GPS coordinates to my photos finally visually pays off. I love this mapping feature.
In case you are wondering about some of the dots. My GPS tracker works just fine when I am sitting in a plane heading for the USA.
Sunday, February 26. 2012
Jan Altink in the Groninger Museum
As usual I shot a lot of photos of the paintings.
This particular painting is called 'After the visit' and it was painted in 1925. I like it.
Saturday, February 25. 2012
Diederik van Vleuten
In the fall of 2012 Diederik van Vleuten will start a new show using the same concept. This time about the first world war. I am looking forward to it.
Boniface murdered near Dokkum Frisia
Today Dokkum is a very pleasant town in the north of The Netherlands with a little museum dedicated to Boniface.
This is what I learned there. Boniface was born an Englishman near what is now Exeter in Devon in the year 675. When he was killed on June 5th in 752 he was already an old man with a very impressive clergical and political career. What were his accomplishments? He christianized a huge area of Europe what is now mainly Eastern Germany and founded monasteries and bishop seats all over the place. He was an excellent organizer. The borders of the bishop seats he founded are mostly still in use today. With papal letters in hand he organized the local churches in the tradition of Rome. This made him not very popular among the Christian Frankish and Gallic rulers, who had their own ambitions to extend their territories Eastward and did not need an Englishman to meddle in their affairs in their own backyard. To make matters worse, the local Frankish and Gallic churches had deviated considerably from the doctrines of Rome and Boniface was tireless in his efforts to point this out to the local nobility. In short the local christian rulers had plenty of reasons for wanting to get rid of Boniface. So did these Frankish rulers have a hand in organizing the murder of Boniface by the heathen Frisians near Dokkum? We will never know for sure.
The Frisians were punished severely for their horrible crime and most men in Dokkum were butchered and the women were taken back home as trophy. The rest were forcibly Christianized. This did not last very long. In the year 800 the Frisians collectively reverted to paganism and only some time after that the Frankish rulers subdued and converted the proud Frisians again. This time it did last.
Boniface's many travels throughout Europe.
Agriculture museum in Eernewoude
Today we went to the agriculture museum in Eernewoude, Friesland. The reason was that we wanted to see one of the historic shedders made by my father's company in the 50's and 60's. Alas it was not on display. We did see an early example of a Combine made out of timber! The form and shape of it looks familiar, I just had never seen one made out of wood.